Bland AI vs Phonely Comparison (2025)

Bland AI
Starting at $0.09/min
Bland AI charges $0.09 per minute plus a monthly fee, offering basic phone automation with a minimalist interface. But it only supports English by default, only integrates with Twilio, and charges extra for features like voice cloning or concurrency. While it’s pitched as developer-friendly, much of the work—like setting up context management or error handling—falls on you. The voice often sounds flat or overly scripted, and the system can struggle to handle complex flows without dropping threads. It’s an entry-level solution that quickly shows its limitations.
Key Metrics
Latency
1100 ms
Automation
50%
Integrations
15
Onboarding
1 days

Bland AI
Score
66
Latency
1100 ms
Automation
50%
Integrations
15
Onboarding
1 days
Cost
Low
HIPAA Compliant
Yes

Phonely
Score
61
Latency
1200 ms
Automation
52%
Integrations
17
Onboarding
1 days
Cost
Medium
HIPAA Compliant
Yes
Bland AI
Bland AI charges $0.09 per minute plus a monthly fee, offering basic phone automation with a minimalist interface. But it only supports English by default, only integrates with Twilio, and charges extra for features like voice cloning or concurrency. While it’s pitched as developer-friendly, much of the work—like setting up context management or error handling—falls on you. The voice often sounds flat or overly scripted, and the system can struggle to handle complex flows without dropping threads. It’s an entry-level solution that quickly shows its limitations.
Phonely
Phonely AI bills itself as a half-price, real-time, human-sounding receptionist, but in practice its $45–$900/month tiers hide gates around voice cloning, advanced analytics, and telemarketing workflows, forcing you into Growth or Agency plans just to unlock basic follow-up features. The voice quality can still wobble into robotic stress when handles complex queries, and “0s time to lead” claims evaporate once you factor in the manual routing tweaks and context-handoff hiccups that surface in real deployments. Integrations are limited to Google Calendar, Zapier, and a handful of CRM connectors—anything custom means wrestling with their sparse API docs—while the dashboard feels cluttered and the documentation skimpy. For companies seeking a truly plug-and-play AI receptionist, Phonely delivers half the promise but twice the maintenance.
Full Comparison
Vendor | Score | Latency | Automation | Integrations | Cost | Action |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OpenCall.ai $0.10/ minute | 93 | 700 ms | 76% | 2000 | Low | |
![]() Retell.ai $0.07 – 0.08 /min | 82 | 950 ms | 55% | 25 | Low | |
![]() Sierra AI $2 per successful outcome | 79 | 800 ms | 60% | 30 | Low | |
![]() PolyAI $0.25 /min (example case study) | 67 | 1700 ms | 72% | 25 | Medium | |
![]() Bland AI $0.09/min | 66 | 1100 ms | 50% | 15 | Low | |
![]() Phonely $396 (yearly) | 61 | 1200 ms | 52% | 17 | Medium | |
![]() Hey Rosie $49/mo (250 min) + $0.25/min | 57 | 950 ms | 60% | 1 | Low | |
![]() Smith.ai $3.25 /call (Starter 30 calls @ $97.50/mo) | 55 | 2300 ms | 40% | 30 | Medium | |
![]() 8x8 XCaaS $60 per seat per month | 49 | 250 ms | 50% | 15 | Medium | |
![]() CloudTalk $25 – $50 /user/mo | 47 | 23 ms | 40% | 500 | Low | |
Synthflow AI $0.08 /min (Growth) | 20 | 2300 ms | 45% | 20 | Low | |
![]() Balto.ai $100 / seat /mo | 12 | 100 ms | 0% | 40 | High |